*1) What are your favorite features of TiddlyWiki – Classic?* ● Custom fields ● Easy customization of CSS, view, edit & page templates ● Easy and fast editing of nearly any aspect of the system ● Local saving directly to disk single files with backups ● Fast searching on very large files ● Copy/past install of plug-ins + Easy modifcation of plugins ● The aviablity of highly useful plug-ins ● Ease of transport and shareablity ● No needed server software
*2) What plug-ins (if any) do you consider essential for TiddlyWiki – Classic?* ● FieldsEditorPlugin ● GotoPlugin ● HTMLFormattingPlugin ● InlineJavascriptPlugin ● RevisionsPlugin ● SearchOptionsPlugin ● SectionLinksPlugin ● TableOfContentsPlugin ● TaggedTemplateTweak ● TiddlersBarPlugin ● TreeviewPlugin *2.5) What plug-ins (if any) would you rather not be without?* ● CheckboxPlugin ● DiscussionPlugin ● IntelliTaggerPlugin ● QuickEditPlugin ● RelatedTiddlersPlugin ● ThemedTiddlerPlugin ● UndoPlugin ● WhatLinksHerePlugin *3) Can you give a brief example of how you use TiddlyWiki – Classic?* Personal database, Book/writing management, Creative book publishing, Teaching aid, Manuals, mock-ups, General notebooks & Personal journal. *4) What software (if any) did you try before deciding on TiddlyWiki – Classic and if possible can you give a brief summery of why you chose to use TiddlyWiki – Classic over them?* RedNotebook, Zim, wikidPad, Mars Notebook, BasKet, NixNote, MyLifeOrganized, myBase, Cherrytree, The Guide, Wiki on a Stick, MyTetra, Book on a Stick, DokuWiki, MediaWiki, Wikia, XWiki, BoltWiki, & Twiki TWc is fast responsive and easy to customize. Well many of the dedicated program wiki such as “The Guide” have extensive feature lists and easy useability they offer virtually no interface customizability and no good way to do core feature editing. Full server wikies offer great customizability however are much slower and often require editing many files to get the results you can do easily with TWc all within TWc its self; They also lack the same level of portability found in TWc and dedicated program wikies (Though they can be made very close with the right extra software [eg:Sever2go].) *5) What have you been unable to do with TiddlyWiki – Classic that you really wished you could?* Separate system/plugin/utilitiy tags (Revision, exclude*, Tree position tags, Theme tags..etc. ) from users/content relative tags. *6) If you could change anything about TiddlyWiki – Classic what would it be?* I can’t think of anything at the moment I am pretty content with TWc outside of not always being able to use other Javascript libraries as intended compared to working on static or PHP/SQL driven wikis however that seems to simply be the nature of the beast. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
