On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:14 PM, PMario <pmari...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thursday, November 21, 2013 4:10:43 PM UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote: >> >> >> I appreciate the argument about people maybe wanting to use a field >> called 'color' for their own purposes. They're already out of luck if they >> want to use such common terms as 'text' and 'title'; it's a trade off >> between expressiveness and extensibility. >> > > With TWc plugins use a prefix for a custom field eg: server.type .. > because type may be used by a used allready. > So I think "best practice" would be to say: mytheme.color if it is > relevant for my theme only. >
Yes, I'd agree. But the existing 'color' field is intentionally not plugin-specific. It's an attempt (along with the 'icon' field) to capture the general idea of a colour associated with a tiddler. Best wishes Jeremy > > what do you think? > > -m > -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:jeremy.rus...@gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
