Hi Ton But text/css is not in the list of type to be selected. Mario said: Add it > manually. > But there is a Plain text (text/plain) entry in the type list which gives > the same result. >
I've added text/css for 5.0.8 > Both text/css and text/plain do show the styles in "readable" form. > > Is there a difference in types between text/css and text/plain? > At the moment they'll both be displayed the same, and the stylesheet mechanism will render both the same. But text/css would be a clearer way to mark intention. Best wishes Jeremy > If there is no difference, change the type to "Plain text (text/css)" That > will be less confusing. > > Cheers, > > Ton > > > On Monday, January 27, 2014 10:42:58 PM UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > >> Hi Ton >> >>> >>> Is it allowed to use <pre>...</pre> around the styles in the stylesheet >>> while using txt/css as type? >>> >> >> No, you can't insert <pre> within the text of text/css tiddlers because >> the text within the tiddler is not subject to wiki processing. But the >> entire tiddler will be displayed in <pre> tags anyhow, because it's a text >> tiddler. >> >> Best wishes >> >> Jeremy. >> >> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Ton >>> >>> >>> On Monday, January 27, 2014 9:47:01 PM UTC+1, Ton Gerner wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Jeremy, >>>> >>>> On Monday, January 27, 2014 8:49:32 PM UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston wrote: >>>>> >>>>> You should only store stylesheets as text/css if they don't contain >>>>> any TW5 macros or transclusions. If you use transclusions and macros (like >>>>> the stylesheets in the core themes), then it is perfectly OK to use triple >>>>> backticks to mark sections that you want to exclude from wikification. >>>>> >>>> >>>> OK, I didn't know and had no problems with triple backticks. >>>> >>>> Anyhow, it looks far better with triple backticks (more readable) than >>>> when I change it to txt/css, see atttachments (in edit mode it looks fine). >>>> >>>> Is there another possibility to show it like code shows? >>>> >>>> If it is needed to change to txt/css it will be handy if: >>>> >>>> 1) txt/css is in the list of types >>>> 2) there is a note in the documentation (searching for stylesheet gives >>>> only something about the tag $:/tags/stylesheet) >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Ton >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best wishes >>>>> >>>>> Jeremy >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Ton Gerner <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Mario, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for the comments. >>>>>> I had not thought about the text/css type. >>>>>> The !important is a left-over from old days (alpha10 or so). I'll >>>>>> look into that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Ton >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Monday, January 27, 2014 8:12:54 PM UTC+1, PMario wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Monday, January 27, 2014 3:41:06 PM UTC+1, Ton Gerner wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That means I am still using all CSS styles in my stylesheets within >>>>>>>> 'triple backticks' without any problem. >>>>>>>> The stylesheet you mention is used in my guide about a top menu and >>>>>>>> toolbars [2]. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Ton, >>>>>>> If you want to display the stylesheet tiddler as text, just use >>>>>>> >>>>>>> type: *text*/ >>>>>>> *css * >>>>>>> You may need to type it by hand, since the dropdown doesn't know it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So you don't need to use "non CSS markup in your tiddler". It may >>>>>>> fail with weired errors in the future. Such errors are very hard to >>>>>>> track >>>>>>> down, after 1 year or 2 :/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There is a second thing I just saw in the style sheets. If >>>>>>> !important is really needed, then imo the base theme concept is broken >>>>>>> because !important is viral. So everyone else that want's to modify your >>>>>>> theme, will need important keyword too. So if there are 2 more >>>>>>> iterations >>>>>>> you'll end up having !important all over the places. .... I'll need to >>>>>>> investigate, to be sure. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -mario >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jeremy Ruston >>>>> mailto:[email protected] >>>>> >>>> >> >> >> -- >> Jeremy Ruston >> mailto:[email protected] >> > -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
