Hi Alex, I think this post was similar to yours https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywiki/LV4itfpS9yM
you could use field names to refer to connected tiddlers (thus mytid:yourtid - that is mytid with field yourtid connects mytid to yourtid and the contents of the field would contain a weight of the strength of the relationship, or it could contain a label for the relationship ,or both) cheers BJ On Thursday, October 2, 2014 4:21:46 AM UTC+2, AlexHough wrote: > > Dear TiddlyFans, > > > Today I was drawing on of those spider type diagrams, with lines as links. > I was thinking how to convert my diagrams into TiddlyWikis. I have been > here before, and if I remember a suggested solution was to create a tiddler > to represent the link. This type of tiddler would be like a "junction box"- > tiddler in, tiddler out. > > I was thinking about the issue from a fresh perspective, years after I > first thought about it. > > The first question, was how would I write this in wiki text, and would I > a) adopt a convention or b) have a macro convert a normal link into a link > to the "junction box" thus forcing the existence of each link being a > tiddler. > > The "link tiddlers" could be tagged, so there could be different types of > link, similar to a concept diagram [1]. > > The idea comes from a friend who models organisations. To her the links > between the boxes are her main focus. I had this in mind when I was > thinking about the whole issue. > > Here is a potential scenario I'd like to model; > > 1) I go to places and meet people. > 2) I regularly go to some places and meet the same people > 3) Ideas and conversations develop and these feed into other events. > > I would like to annotate and track the conversations and create feedback > loops between people, places and ideas. People and places are static, but > the events are unique (I can't be in two different places at the same time) > > The links, to become "proper" feedback loops either make something more > like it is of less (positive and negative feedback). An example might be a > collaboration may become more or less likely after a few other events which > have some kind of dependancy on the likelihood of the collaboration happing. > > Maybe each loop and potential outcomes could be modelled and ranked. I > could then make a judgement about the value of possible collaborations, but > also have a tool which I could browse, add to and share. > > Has TiddlyWiki intertingled my sanity again? > > Alex > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concept_map > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
