Hi BJ, yes it is... Looks like its time to dive in to TW5 and start making stuff.... here we go again
best wishes Alex On 2 October 2014 14:11, BJ <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alex, > I think this post was similar to yours > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywiki/LV4itfpS9yM > > you could use field names to refer to connected tiddlers (thus > mytid:yourtid - that is mytid with field yourtid connects mytid to yourtid > and the contents of the field would contain a weight of the strength of the > relationship, or it could contain a label for the relationship ,or both) > > cheers > > BJ > > > On Thursday, October 2, 2014 4:21:46 AM UTC+2, AlexHough wrote: >> >> Dear TiddlyFans, >> >> >> Today I was drawing on of those spider type diagrams, with lines as >> links. I was thinking how to convert my diagrams into TiddlyWikis. I have >> been here before, and if I remember a suggested solution was to create a >> tiddler to represent the link. This type of tiddler would be like a >> "junction box"- tiddler in, tiddler out. >> >> I was thinking about the issue from a fresh perspective, years after I >> first thought about it. >> >> The first question, was how would I write this in wiki text, and would I >> a) adopt a convention or b) have a macro convert a normal link into a link >> to the "junction box" thus forcing the existence of each link being a >> tiddler. >> >> The "link tiddlers" could be tagged, so there could be different types of >> link, similar to a concept diagram [1]. >> >> The idea comes from a friend who models organisations. To her the links >> between the boxes are her main focus. I had this in mind when I was >> thinking about the whole issue. >> >> Here is a potential scenario I'd like to model; >> >> 1) I go to places and meet people. >> 2) I regularly go to some places and meet the same people >> 3) Ideas and conversations develop and these feed into other events. >> >> I would like to annotate and track the conversations and create feedback >> loops between people, places and ideas. People and places are static, but >> the events are unique (I can't be in two different places at the same time) >> >> The links, to become "proper" feedback loops either make something more >> like it is of less (positive and negative feedback). An example might be a >> collaboration may become more or less likely after a few other events which >> have some kind of dependancy on the likelihood of the collaboration happing. >> >> Maybe each loop and potential outcomes could be modelled and ranked. I >> could then make a judgement about the value of possible collaborations, but >> also have a tool which I could browse, add to and share. >> >> Has TiddlyWiki intertingled my sanity again? >> >> Alex >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concept_map >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
