You ask for "best practice" but I get the impression that for TW5 there still mostly experimenting. Maybe I'm wrong. Personally, I'm still pretty much on TWC and with multiple wikis. But one of my main interests in TW5 is exactly the "all in one" possibility made possible with the node.js version.
<:-) On Friday, October 24, 2014 4:26:23 PM UTC+2, Captain Packers wrote: > > I'm just wondering what MO people have adopted as "best practice" and why. > Do you use a single TiddlyWiki for everything, or do you have a virtual > "web" of multiple TiddlyWikis that you jump around in. > > I see the benefit of a single TiddlyWiki as being the search ability and > non-linear convenience and approach around which TiddlyWiki was built. My > concern about a single TiddlyWiki is the eventual size that it might attain > and related performance issues, especially if you start embedding and > attaching files internally (TW5). > > With a web of TiddlyWikis, they could be kept small, but you might > sacrifice some of the search ability of TiddlyWiki. > > I'm using TiddlyWiki mostly for journaling my workflow. > > I would like to know how others are doing this. > > Thanks in advance. > > Captain Packers > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
