Just thinking that you could have a master index TW with short versions of all your tiddlers. A link or a field would contain the reference to the full tiddler. This way you could reference a much larger body of data without the associated performance loss.
On Friday, October 24, 2014 7:26:23 AM UTC-7, Captain Packers wrote: > > I'm just wondering what MO people have adopted as "best practice" and why. > Do you use a single TiddlyWiki for everything, or do you have a virtual > "web" of multiple TiddlyWikis that you jump around in. > > I see the benefit of a single TiddlyWiki as being the search ability and > non-linear convenience and approach around which TiddlyWiki was built. My > concern about a single TiddlyWiki is the eventual size that it might attain > and related performance issues, especially if you start embedding and > attaching files internally (TW5). > > With a web of TiddlyWikis, they could be kept small, but you might > sacrifice some of the search ability of TiddlyWiki. > > I'm using TiddlyWiki mostly for journaling my workflow. > > I would like to know how others are doing this. > > Thanks in advance. > > Captain Packers > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
