Hi Tobias I'm not sure that I fully understand your specific proposals, but I certainly agree that the core should have more features to help people split and aggregate tiddlers.
Best wishes Jeremy. On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Tobias Beer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > >> The purest expression of TiddlyWikis philosophy would be to break a >> tiddler with sections into separate tiddlers, and transclude the sections >> back together when you need to view them as a single unit. >> > > Perhaps this can be automated a little more, after all, and merged into a > compromise by inventing something like "section tiddlers" which could get... > > - automatic titles based on parent + the section title > - allow for section ordering using some list field (not sure about > section nesting though) > > As the chosen approach is slicing a section down to being a tiddler, that > means that supporting capabilities are somewhat desireable that help a user > to aggregate the now scattered contents, or display such now remote or > "hidden contents" (data, fields) in a somewhat editable / templatable > viewmode. > > Tobias. > -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
