Danielo Rodríguez wrote: > > Maybe you could already now permit every tiddler created >> <https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B-USg0ow4LCZREVYcjJpYzhOcFU&usp=sharing> >> >> so they do show, and, if possible auto-tag them with "UserTest" or similar. >> This would make it easier to see how it is actually supposed to behave plus >> it would be exciting to see ones own tiddler actually get in there. >> > >> > I'm not a fan of using other tags that the user puts manually. That's why > we have the creator field. What is wrong with it? >
My point was to treat every "test tiddler" as actual documentation just to let us sense how things would work if we were using it for real. Or you could maybe copy-paste some real documentation (e.g from tw.com) that people were allow to experiment with. The idea with a "UserTest" tag was just so you could flush out every such tiddler whenever you want. If you go by creator field, you don't know if it is a test or if it is a serious documentation attempt that should be kept. Or do I misunderstand something? Of course, if everything is to be treated as just experiments then no system created tag would be needed. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
