My paper size was respecting your previous specifications and it seems quite fine by me, no change there.
OK, so I remastered the poster to fix a few small issues with the previous version and to make some additions I meant to add, like the small call line to emphasize the topics and reworking the text a bit. Did some further thinking, organized my ideas and refined the wording to better match what I initially meant to say, and also added your "call to action" right on top. This is not at all a closed final version, its open to debate so please let me know what you think, and what should be reverted back to original, some topical points: - Again I understand you want a more down-to-earth "common user" approach to the phrasing but I still urge you (community dwellers, knowledgeable people and developers) to please review my text, mainly to see if I committed no technical inaccuracies, and no grammatical/syntax errors. Please do correct me as English is not my native language. - Is the catch phrase or call to action to your liking, or did you have something else in mind? Suggestions are gladly accepted, I am not very good with words ;) - I tried changing the link to www.tiddlywiki.com. Isn't the poster supposed to promote tiddlywiki itself to new users? I think it makes a lot more sense to point directly to the real thing, instead of pointing to a poster again, which might confuse new users who seem to be the main target audience. Other users will probably find their way to the poster easily. - Removed the fish shadow mostly for practical reasons: makes more room for additional text, and unclutters the poster of redundant visual elements. It can easily be added back in if you think its essential. - I kept "personal signature" watermark throughout the previews, I assume it should be removed for the final version, right? <http://www.duarteramos.pt/media/share/TiddlyWiki_TiddlerPoster.png> Here is a PNG version with 5580 x 4200 pixels, I think it is more than enough to print even bigger then an ISO A3 (I can make it larger if desired), and at about 1.4mb filesize seems like an acceptable download for today's standards. Equivalent PDF clocks at about 206Kb (apparently the blurry shadows have to be rasterized, since PDF doesn't support all SVG filters but I don't think quality will be an issue). Equivalent SVG file will probably be under 146Kb after optimization. Awaiting further instructions -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
