Hi Tobias, > that looks like poor use of double square brackets to me...
Let me suggest a less abstract example, then. Your tb5 site offers a macro for colouring text <http://tb5.tiddlyspot.com/#Colored%20Text>. One can easily imagine passing a whole sentence, e.g. a warning message, to this macro, and that sentence could contain a link. That link would not be detected by the link-tracking system that drives the References and Orphans tabs. > There could well be a recommendation to always use single or double quotes or triple double quotes for strings and reserve double square brackets for tiddler titles only. But that still wouldn't solve the general case in which a quote-delimited parameter can contain a double-square-bracketed link as *part* of its content. > Perhaps "tiddler-links", or TiddlyLinks but not "static links". I agree that "static" isn't the right word, but the alternatives you suggest could apply equally well to links generated on the fly by macros and widgets and whatnot. Perhaps we could speak of a "literal" link – a link that is literally present in the text field of a tiddler. – æ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
