Hi Dave, > If I have a starting image (making sure it's as small as reasonably > possible) and I draw on it and save it maybe using the new tiddler's name, > does anyone know if that would actually use more file space than what I'm > talking about?
You'd go about it differently. Rather than renaming, use cloning. And yes, you'd duplicate that image, which is what you want anyway. What would be really cool is if there was a way to overlay an exertnal image and the resulting semi-transparent overlay being smaller in its footprint ...as it should contain less information. Perhaps there could be an almost pain-free workflow involving svg-editor <http://svg-edit.googlecode.com/svn/branches/stable/editor/svg-editor.html> ... 1. open svg-editor 2. place your image in the background 3. draw svg elements on top 4. remove background 5. save svg 6. create image tiddler with (perhaps referring to an external image) 7. use a to-be-created macro in another tiddler which overlays the svg on top of the image with proper scaling All this is a lot better than pixel-based editing, imho... not just for annotations. Best wishes, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
