Picking up on Tobias's comment at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/TiddlyWiki/b57cfTZoI5w:
Maybe the documentation for plugins in Jermolene's repository (i.e. plugins that are version-linked to the core, such as KaTeX and railroad) should be held centrally on tiddlywiki.com. In the current thread, Tobias said: > I pretty much create a new TiddlySpot (or other individual wiki) for every little thing. To document and showcase individually. I find that helps with the focus. I can see both sides of this. Certainly it's good to avoid mixing things up into a muddly mess. On the other hand, you then have to spend more time maintaining everything when (say) a new version of the core is released. > Personally, I also wouldn't ship js comments with the core. Perhaps plugins should offer an alternative compact version of themselves, in which the JavaScript would be minified and the documentation removed. Then the user could choose which they want. But this would mean more work for the plugin developer. – æ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
