My take on this is pretty much the same as Mario's would just add it is important to make sure you attribute the content from its source if other than your own, understand that regardless of what you may add to the material you can not change that license, that license is also applied to your efforts, and also make it apparent preferably using the proper cc logos and emblems for that particular cc license that the material is cc and where it is available. TiddlyWiki's license does not override or change the cc license of the material it contains. But, as Mario said I am no lawyer either, but maybe that helps?
Can not wait to see what you may be working on can you make any of the upcoming hangouts? On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 12:08:33 PM UTC-7, PMario wrote: > > IMO There is one more thing, that is important. > > If you published your content with a very permissive eg: BSD license you > are pretty much nailed to it. ... Since the internet doesn't forget > anything. ... > > an example: > > - If you publish your content with MIT > - I download it. I have it > - The next day you publish it with CC-BY-SA ... That's possible --- BUT > - I do own a valid MIT licensed version, with which I can do what I want. > > So it's very easy to make a license more permissive but the other way > around is hard. > > have fun! > mario > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
