On Thursday, February 12, 2015 at 9:00:19 AM UTC+1, Danielo Rodríguez wrote: > > Thank you very much for your explanation! It is a very good summary. >
you are welcome. > Basically what I want to achieve is attribution, non-commercial use and > free to distribute. > So this one would be CC-BY-NC ... which is a relatively restrictive license. AS I wrote. Changing it to CC-BY which imo is very similar to BSD is easy and can be done at any times. > That's why I choose the CC licence (and because it's cool logo). > If you just want to license your content. IMO CC is preferable. BSD was developed for software. CC also has prose text in mind. > Maybe It's better to use BSD for my purposes? How should I include BSD > licence? > Have a look a the template. It's about 15 lines. So including it in a tiddler is simple. Since BSD has the "must" clause for the copyright attribution you need to create the copyright text. > For CC it's very easy, I just include the logo and a link to the license > and that's all. Is something similar for BSD? > not really, since you need a personalised copyright notice. -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
