On Thursday, February 12, 2015 at 8:04:06 AM UTC+1, Tobias Beer wrote: > > Would that perhaps be a (more) viable approach for the core as well, > seeing as how rather costly that handful of core svg's are compared to > something like FontAwesome <http://tobibeer.github.io/tw/fa/> ... > speeking in sheer filesize and perhaps also usability (in css). >
FontAwesome is awesome, but imo svgs are not costly at all, if you save them without the clutter. CSS styling is much more flexible. eg: Try to create a 2 color icon with a font. -1 on icon fonts for the core. see: http://css-tricks.com/icon-fonts-vs-svg/ -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
