Hi Mario, FontAwesome is awesome, > but imo svgs are not costly at all, > if you save them without the clutter. > CSS styling is much more flexible. eg: > Try to create a 2 color icon with a font. >
Of course, there are limits. I think there's plenty colorful wiggle room for creating decently colored images using stroke, fill, shadows, hover states and all that. As for size, this is what the absolutes say: *65k => 44 core images* *118k => 519 awesome font icons* CSS styling is much more flexible. eg: Try to create a 2 color icon with a > font. I hope to never see a core icon library with in-themselves multi-color icons. Also, being able to do that in theory doesn't mean that the core icons practically allow for it... most of which are optimized not to. Certainly, not all grass is green in icon-font-land, however... http://css-tricks.com/icon-fonts-vs-svg ...is a bit too biased to my taste. As for the effects of fonts and antialiasing, I'd would have liked to see a live example rather than rely on a screenshot. ~ I think it would offer a wide range of possibilities if the core catered for using icon fonts with things like custom command buttons or tag icons. As for command buttons, I'm pretty sure that should work quite well with a little know-how. As for tag / tiddler icons... I have yet to experiment. Best wishes, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
