Hi Richard, My 8MB file only has ~580 tiddlers which is a tiny fraction of your file which sounds like it's still very responsive.
I'm only doing regular searches and I'm running Windows 7/Firefox Mine must be bloated with embedded image files so I'll take these out and hopefully that will speed things up. Thanks, Jon On Monday, 23 February 2015 21:43:43 UTC, RichardWilliamSmith wrote: > > Hi Jon, > > I know some issues with the search have been discussed in the past, > specifically with regards to limiting the maximum number of results and > waiting until there's a minimal string before searching. Having said that, > I have personally found the search to be quite quick. > > I just checked and my biggest file is ~17MB with ~9000 tiddlers and the > search is still very quick (Firefox under OSX yosemite, TW5.1.7 running as > a single file) - typing just the letter 'a', for example, returns 9090 > matches in less than a second. There's a slight lag on entering text in the > search box itself but it's not noticeable enough to be annoying. > > Are the searches you're doing just plain-text matching or something more > exotic? > What is the set-up that you're using? (browser/OS/standalone or node etc.) > How many tiddlers do your files have in them? > > Regards, > Richard > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
