On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 3:53:46 PM UTC+1, Tobias Beer wrote: > > Would be great if list-after had a "special case" for the empty value >> (like "list-before" does), meaning "load after everything else". >> > > +1 > > Possibly, chosing a name wisely may help as well, since these things get > loaded alphabetically, imho. >
IMO this problem should not be solved with something that demands the user to actively keep it in mind. Particularly since disregarding it *might* work, resulting in inconsistent behaviour. I'd prefer that any user defined system tiddlers are loaded after core tiddlers, or similar solution. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
