I've started to think about annotation. In my TiddlyWiki, I found that I was using pretty links to annotate text. Annotations could be collected using filters of tiddlers containing pipe character
Alex On Friday, 27 March 2015, Peter Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the comment, Mario, and I appreciate your concerns. I was a > fishing a little as I saw Jon Udell is working there now -- for folk of a > certain age he gives the project a degree of credibility. As per his blog > comments, I was thinking primarily of use with a class of students. > > http://blog.jonudell.net/2015/03/22/annotating-the-web-my-new-job/ > > On Friday, March 27, 2015 at 10:17:44 AM UTC, PMario wrote: >> >> Hi Peter, >> >> The idea is interesting and the organisation behind hypothesis seems to >> be interesting too. >> The vision video is great, but imo the implementation has some flaws >> atm. >> >> I have 3 major issues: >> >> 1) There is no official API to communicate with the service. .. At least >> I couldn't find one. ... TiddlyWiki is not a web page, it's an application. >> So TW needs to be in control of its content. ... >> >> 2) To get the annotation working you need to call your own web page >> using theirs eg: https://via.hypothes.is/h/http://tiddlywiki.com/ >> So I pay for a nice domain name, just to get it hijacked. For my taste >> this behaviour is very aggressive. >> >> 3) IMO the TiddlyWiki workflow contradicts the annotations value. >> TiddlyWiki is highly dynamic. For me tiddlers only make sense, if they >> are refactored (according to feedback) >> If the tiddler content changes enough, imo the annotation linking >> mechanism doesn't work anymore. >> >> Having a look at there roadmap <https://hypothes.is/roadmap/> it seems >> they see this problem. See: "Archive annotated pages, recover orphans >> <https://github.com/hypothesis/vision/issues/76>" ... >> They want to store the old version of a page ... Which is fine in the >> first view. ... >> - But what if the original content isn't licensed that way? >> - What if the author of the original content doesn't want this behaviour? >> >> I really like the idea, to play nice with them but I have some concerns. >> just my 2 cents. >> >> have fun! >> mario >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tiddlywiki%[email protected]');> > . > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
