Hello Jeremy, Why adding another mechanism instead of using the ones that exists already? El 09/09/2015 14:05, "Jeremy Ruston" <[email protected]> escribió:
> Hi Evolena > > I was busy spreading the word by using Tiddlywiki in a project with others >> people (so I went further in interface customization than I ever did >> before, with forms to create tiddlers or selectable fields in edit mode), >> but I've always kept an eye on the Google Group and on the new things on >> GitHub (except maybe between around the v1.0.8). >> > > Great, I hope you'll be able to share some of the fruits in due course. > > The more I practice Tiddlywiki, the more I think that tags should remain >> for user/content-oriented structure (I can accept system tags since they >> are less visible), and that fields are the best way to manage all that is >> "below" the application (all that "make it work", the interface, etc.). >> Because we can give a semantic to the values of fields through the field >> name, but it is not as easy for tags. >> I've once reuse the whole toc-macro recursive logic to use a "parent" >> field instead of tags (+ some cosmetic changes). >> > > Interesting. Would you think that we should migrate away from the current > system tag mechanism. For instance with a new "system-tags" field that > contains a list. We could support the new schema alongside the old. > > Best wishes > > Jeremy > > > > -- > Jeremy Ruston > mailto:[email protected] > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/CAHfj67U3eFsmAOK_cTGmSkCyx5w%2Bh-4wJ%2B-_12dq_d4hmaNPwQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
