Hi Danielo > Why adding another mechanism instead of using the ones that exists already? > I think that Evolena's point is that system tags and using tags for structure get in the way of using tags semantically. But nothing new is being invented here: the core already extensively uses fields to identify tiddlers and their characteristics.
Best wishes Jeremy > El 09/09/2015 14:05, "Jeremy Ruston" <[email protected]> escribió: > >> Hi Evolena >> >> I was busy spreading the word by using Tiddlywiki in a project with >>> others people (so I went further in interface customization than I ever did >>> before, with forms to create tiddlers or selectable fields in edit mode), >>> but I've always kept an eye on the Google Group and on the new things on >>> GitHub (except maybe between around the v1.0.8). >>> >> >> Great, I hope you'll be able to share some of the fruits in due course. >> >> The more I practice Tiddlywiki, the more I think that tags should remain >>> for user/content-oriented structure (I can accept system tags since they >>> are less visible), and that fields are the best way to manage all that is >>> "below" the application (all that "make it work", the interface, etc.). >>> Because we can give a semantic to the values of fields through the field >>> name, but it is not as easy for tags. >>> I've once reuse the whole toc-macro recursive logic to use a "parent" >>> field instead of tags (+ some cosmetic changes). >>> >> >> Interesting. Would you think that we should migrate away from the current >> system tag mechanism. For instance with a new "system-tags" field that >> contains a list. We could support the new schema alongside the old. >> >> Best wishes >> >> Jeremy >> >> >> >> -- >> Jeremy Ruston >> mailto:[email protected] >> > -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/CAPKKYJZdsZkSYX-AGKe%2BPSz%2Bi-voFuGcpwhQPwYPS3pvFuZpYw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
