OMG, that's just what I said in GitHub <https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/1727#issuecomment-141584816>, as you were posting here in the discussion forums. Great minds think alike!
On Saturday, September 19, 2015 at 10:24:19 AM UTC+12, Rustem wrote: > > I've had a bit of a discussion over at GitHub > <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FJermolene%2FTiddlyWiki5%2Fissues%2F1908&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFMTEp9VYXLtnkZmSkRvGxHZ2myYQ>, > > that made me think... > > Right now TiddlyWiki is still failrly basic as it is. But with the influx > of new features, there will be more and more people wanting things to look > one way or the other. > > I am comfortable with customizing the interface of my wiki on my own, plus > I don't feel like arguing my point of view to death. But when it comes to > modifying/adding the deeper internals of TiddlyWiki, I still completely > rely on what is delivered by Jeremy. > > So, I thought it would be nice if there was a "bare-bones" edition of > TiddlyWiki. It would let me enjoy all the latest improvements to the "core > core", without having to struggle with the ever-increasing number of "bells > and whistles" in order to keep my wiki looking just the way I like it. > > --R. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/89cabd0c-2171-45d6-9d24-d389556967c5%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
