Ah, I see now, so the only thing that is keeping the document dirty is $:/HistoryList itself then? That seems a bit silly to me. If I didn't commit the changes then TW should treat the "Draft of..." as if it never had existed, and delete that entry from the history list, IMHO.
On Tuesday, 29 September 2015 03:53:13 UTC+13, Evolena wrote: > > > > Le lundi 28 septembre 2015 16:48:27 UTC+2, Hegart Dmishiv a écrit : >> >> Thanks for explaining that, *Evolena*. I would have thought that >> clicking the "discard changes to this tiddler" button would have deleted >> the "Draft of..." tiddler, thus returning the TW wiki instance to the state >> it was in prior to entering edit mode, with no changes having been made at >> all. Are you saying that I'll have a whole heap of random "Draft of..." >> tiddlers somewhere in my wiki then? Because it still seems to think the >> document is dirty, even after clicking the "discard changes to this >> tiddler" button. >> > > No, they aren't existing tiddlers, the draft are discarded. But their name > remain in the $:/HistoryList tiddler (and not $:/StoryList as I said > before, sorry). Open this HistoyList tiddler, use your TW, and see what > happens. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a919d675-7801-44f4-b990-cdca36d8803c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
