Hi *@Jeremy*,

Thanks for pointing me to that issue on GitHub. I understand what you're 
saying about two actions canceling each other out, sure. But you also 
replied in that issue to *@giffmex*, to the effect that, if a tiddler is a 
state tiddler in $:/state then the core will "exclude it from the dirty 
handling". Why not move $:/HistoryList to $:/state/HistoryList to give it 
the same exclusion? After all, I would have thought that the history list, 
by its very existence, is part of the state of the wiki.

Kind regards,

Hegart.


On Tuesday, 29 September 2015 05:03:01 UTC+13, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> Hi Hegart
>
> There has been some discussion of this point before:
>
> https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/740
>
> I think the source of the confusion is the logic I discuss at the end of 
> the thread: the wiki is considered dirty if any change has been made to it, 
> without regard for whether those changes cancel one another out.
>
> Best wishes
>
> Jeremy.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Hegart Dmishiv <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Ah, I see now, so the only thing that is keeping the document dirty is 
>> $:/HistoryList itself then? That seems a bit silly to me. If I didn't 
>> commit the changes then TW should treat the "Draft of..." as if it never 
>> had existed, and delete that entry from the history list, IMHO.
>>
>> On Tuesday, 29 September 2015 03:53:13 UTC+13, Evolena wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le lundi 28 septembre 2015 16:48:27 UTC+2, Hegart Dmishiv a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for explaining that, *Evolena*. I would have thought that 
>>>> clicking the "discard changes to this tiddler" button would have deleted 
>>>> the "Draft of..." tiddler, thus returning the TW wiki instance to the 
>>>> state 
>>>> it was in prior to entering edit mode, with no changes having been made at 
>>>> all. Are you saying that I'll have a whole heap of random "Draft of..." 
>>>> tiddlers somewhere in my wiki then? Because it still seems to think the 
>>>> document is dirty, even after clicking the "discard changes to this 
>>>> tiddler" button.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, they aren't existing tiddlers, the draft are discarded. But their 
>>> name remain in the $:/HistoryList tiddler (and not $:/StoryList as I 
>>> said before, sorry). Open this HistoyList tiddler, use your TW, and see 
>>> what happens.
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "TiddlyWiki" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a919d675-7801-44f4-b990-cdca36d8803c%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a919d675-7801-44f4-b990-cdca36d8803c%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Jeremy Ruston
> mailto:[email protected] <javascript:>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/53d071cd-8aaf-4034-bd0f-6eb2abe9ae95%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to