I can be pretty dense some times and I generally assume I'm in no way special, therefore other people can be pretty dense at times as well. So to make it abundantly obvious to people like me, why not change the name of the link and the linked-to page from "TiddlyWiki Community Documentation" <http://www.tiddlywiki.org> to "TiddlyWiki Classic Community Documentation <http://www.tiddlywiki.org>"? I know it says "For Classic...." on this page and "For TW <=2.8.1" on the doc page, but the link and the title are going to be the first things people look at. I do agree with keeping the Classic docs linked -- as long as classic is still in use then it's beneficial to keep around. And as a user of both classic and tw5, I know I look at it from time to time....
On Friday, October 2, 2015 at 1:48:10 PM UTC-4, Eric Shulman wrote: > > They are not two separate applications. Nearly everything in Tiddlywiki5 > is based on funtionality initially developed in Tiddlywiki Classic. Just > because *you* don't use TWC doesn't mean that we should push 10 years of > valuable discussions off to the side. If we had wanted to do that, we > would have started a new group just for TW5. Before you summarily dismiss > TWC as irrelevant to TW5 discussions, you should consider the fact that > most of the requests for new features in TW5 are based on what has already > been done as plugins in TWC. You could learn a lot by getting to know TWC > and it's rich eco-system of plugins, themes, etc. > > -e > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f11b58ce-3e0b-423f-9aa9-504d836f776b%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
