El viernes, 2 de octubre de 2015, 19:48:10 (UTC+2), Eric Shulman escribió: > > They are not two separate applications. Nearly everything in Tiddlywiki5 > is based on funtionality initially developed in Tiddlywiki Classic. Just > because *you* don't use TWC doesn't mean that we should push 10 years of > valuable discussions off to the side. If we had wanted to do that, we > would have started a new group just for TW5. Before you summarily dismiss > TWC as irrelevant to TW5 discussions, you should consider the fact that > most of the requests for new features in TW5 are based on what has already > been done as plugins in TWC. You could learn a lot by getting to know TWC > and it's rich eco-system of plugins, themes, etc. > > -e >
Hello Eric, I don't know why do you think that, but I don't want to put TWC aside. I don't use it, but that does not mean that I don't appreciate it. You looks offended and I can't understand why. I was just saying that TWC is the old classic version of tiddlywiki, and as long as they share the same idea behind them they work very different. It's liike windows XP and windows 7. They are both fantastic Operating systems, but one is ten years older. I don't want to totally delete any reference to TWC from tiddlywiki.com, I have suggested to put a link to tiddlywiki classic, and put there the documentation. Why do you understand that I want to put it aside from that sentence? In any case, I feel like Robert's Edwards suggestion is the best approach. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/4295ffb2-b7e6-4b4c-9bd0-3f24554860c9%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
