Tobias I agree that it does not make sense to sort the tiddlers by their unsorted tags. What I was wanting to do is list tiddlers in order of their sorted list of tags.
My use case is to review the tiddlers that have a particular tag (or any other filter criteria) so that I can identify "under described" tiddlers, e.g., a tiddler tagged "reference" and no other tags (to identify tiddlers that need an additional tag to identify the type of reference or alternatively combinations of tags that no longer make sense. I'm good at writing lots of notes in my wiki. I'm less good at being able to find and organize previous notes. Reviewing, i.e., curating the tags is helpful to me in keeping the tiddlers easy to discover and avoiding creating redundant notes. I hope this helps clarify my question. Thanks for the response Steve On Thursday, November 5, 2015 at 3:46:00 PM UTC-5, Tobias Beer wrote: > > Hi steve, > > I believe the crucial bit would be... > > the tiddlers in the first column are sorted in order of their list of tag >> pills > > > I don't think it makes much sense to sort tiddlers by their tags field; > the sequence of tags in it being pretty random. > > Why are you trying to do that? > > Tobias. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/17ef35f0-c7e2-4947-9488-6dd79cb1dbbe%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
