This sounds like a really messy way to put a book together. TW isn't really good at collaboration. It might be better to use Google docs or a server based Wiki.
In any event, if you want the quality to be even and consistent, the logic flow not to skip back and forth, and the document to speak with one voice, it needs an editor. Mark On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 9:20:24 AM UTC-7, Mat wrote: > > Yes, of course we should "write a TW" rather than a book. But the "we > write colletively" is problematic as long as we don't have you-know-what, > set up.... yeah, I'm talking about a TWevolution > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2wneBVssPc>... or maybe I mean a > TWederation. Once this is up, I think a really good manual will grow almost > automatically because, as noted, quite a few individuals are interested in > sharing their knowledge and ideas. We only lack the infrastructure. Fellow > Jed has taken the first bold steps but he is of course no more responsible > than anyone else. > > <:-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ada31012-be4a-486f-97f4-b76a7c673bd2%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
