Ciao Jeremy & all, I have followed this specific discussion with great interest.
Quite a lot of it touches into what should be standard fare v. what optional add-ins or macros. Its a very interesting issue with mature "software" like tiddlywiki keeping the balance right between flexible essentials and specific commitments. Personally I'm thinking that some of the discussion is really about APPLICATIONS for specific purposes, rather than core stuff. To the wider public I think the brilliant plug-n-play architecture is not so immediately apparent. Yet some of the highly specific applications that some people have developed have also generated very interesting, useful, plug-ins. I'm sure that's to do with good "utility driven" development. I'm wondering if this collective result could be leveraged more? Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/393948dd-50e7-4221-9bdb-676bc0a98c09%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
