This seems to be going in the right direction, it has already improved 
considerably.

Most of the problems I see probably stem from the simple fact that all of 
this "looks non standard" visually speaking, as it currently stands. Not in 
a negative way, it's just that if a forum "looks" remotely like a regular 
forum UI to a regular user, there's less explanation that needs to be done, 
or if an encyclopedia as the appearance of one, the user will feel right at 
home.

TWCards probably needs some explanation of what they are. I am guessing 
they are some sort of avatar, or perhaps some pre-made tiddlers conforming 
to some standardized pre-defined set of standard fields?
TiddlyPedia also probably needs some better explaining of what it is. I am 
guessing a breed between a Wikipedia and some sort of forum.
I am guessing "Dictionary" could be part of Tiddlypedia?

Other than that it seems to be just a mater of wording to make it seem less 
cryptic and daunting to newcomers and end users.

On Friday, 19 August 2016 17:29:19 UTC+1, Mat wrote:
>
> Thanks for input again Josiah. You're not at all coming across as 
> negative, you're rightfully wondering of what use it will be. I believe 
> this will become clearer as we proceed. Thanks to your and others input I'm 
> understanding how abstract it all still is. But considering how even I must 
> still ask the Jedi very fundamental questions every now and then, I can 
> definitely understand how it takes a while before people "see the light".
>
> Keep the font-page ideas coming!
>
> <:-)
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/effcadb5-247a-4b6c-bfd2-77f8651fc3d2%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to