Updated <http://twed-face.tiddlyspot.com/>- IMO the overall structure is probably decent enough now and I will turn focus to more of the textual content and explicit clarifications. Note that actual *plugins *are not what I have been concerned with in any way. The twed-face site is NOT a real site, and the site it aims to serve is NOT officially launched, including any plugins.
Duarte Farrajota Ramos wrote: > > Most of the problems I see probably stem from the simple fact that all of > this "looks non standard" visually speaking, as it currently stands. Not in > a negative way, it's just that if [...it, as a whole, would resemble some > thing that people are familiar with then it wouldn't need so much > explanation]... > (Is my interpretation of your statement above correct?) Yes, this is true. A cool thing with TW though is that tiddler philosophy makes it very easy to present many very different things in one place. So, one tiddler has a "forum", other has an "app store", a third has a "wizard" etc etc. If one is familiar with TW then I think this is not a problem and IMO TWederation currently requires familiarity with TW (...or does it? In a way, TW requires familiarity with TW.) For the front-page in question I'm framing all the different "features" in one tiddler by using tabs. But each tab content by itself is not that "non standard" - or? (Note this latest update also cleaned up a bit). I'm not sure there are many standards to rely on for respective tab content but any ideas are welcome. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c796df2b-f889-4b34-a879-4fe3127eb5e8%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
