rootsical - it is really appreciated that you give feedback about what is not good enough - especially if it is such a showstopper that you might not use TW at all! Likely, people leaving TW or never really starting, do so silently which makes it very difficult to improve things, of course.
If you find mediawiki better then you should of course go with that. It would be very kind of you if you could just clarify your feedback so we can improve stuff it. Who knows maybe it is even a simple fix or misunderstanding: > just another bit of feedback is that i also found it very hard to find > information and help about tiddlywiki because all the > documentation/resources seem to be presented within tiddlywikis themselves. > Are you saying it is difficult to locate where that/those documentation wiki/s are? Or where, within that/those wikis, the information is located? Any spontaneous opinion on where would be a better place to display the documentation/resources or how? > i still think that mediawiki is the best way to present such information > as people are used to it and i believe it is indexed better by search > engines. > "Search engines" meaning you're using e.g google to find the documentation? Or are the search results inadequate when using the local search tool inside a TW? Thank you! <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8401f67d-a83c-46e4-b653-57552707e6ff%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
