On Thursday, September 29, 2016 at 5:45:29 AM UTC+2, John Newell wrote: > > I may not have communicated this objective clearly - for which I apologise > - but the solution provided by Mario works perfectly. >
That's cool. > The issue is not whether TW needs to detect online connection - as the > TWebook will have (on probably its FIRST SCREEN) the option of online / > offline delivery.... > THAT STATUS will be known by the user - > I know. That's why I did include some "online/offline" messages. So you can see, what's possible, to tell the users manual action is needed. > as the target for these TWebooks is for USE on mobile devices. > The user will know whether they are online or offline - > and even if they aren't sure - the lack of imagery ( or the note that does > appear where an image should be when offline ) > will prompt them to click "the OFFLINE button" ) > That's right. ... but if TW can detect the status, we *could* implement some magic behind the scenes and let the <$image> widget decide, what to show. For TW imo this is a very common use-case, because our initial focus is "offline first". > This has brought up a realisation for me > > *TW - in the way I will deliver THIS project - is far more like an APP > than an ebook.* > Yea, TiddlyWiki is a "chameleon" have fun! mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2323d318-742c-42f9-9d8b-18fadf8fd8fb%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
