Thank you Mat! People are also generally helpful if you ask for help on specific matters > that you're attempting to create. > I thought that the "opposite" approach would work, by capturing people's intents and co-ordinating their work: http://confocal-manawatu.pbworks.com/w/page/114069763/TiddlyWiki%20Intents%20Map Seems not working either... :)
Note that much development takes place as non-official plugins, i.e plugins > that are not officially endorsed on tiddlywiki.com . > All plugins I am going through are being captured on LiM: TiddlyWiki Plugins <http://confocal-manawatu.pbworks.com/TiddlyWiki-Plugins> not only to the convenience of TW community but for the reusability at my projects too. This unpredictability is one of the costs for getting this incredible tool > for free. > I think, that's a matter of trust and focusing on a team's goal. A group of people can be as organised or as chaotic as they want to. You are absolutely right about > The more you participate in some matter and the more you keep it in the > frontal lobe of people, the more likely it is that you catch the interest > of fellow community members. > but that doesn't work either, in my experience on other forums. If accessibility to particular knowledge is not valued in this particular group, it will never be achieved. :) Here is the example recorded on LiM, TiddlyWiki Criticism <http://confocal-manawatu.pbworks.com/TiddlyWiki-Criticism>: "28Dec16 Accessibility to Particular Topics on TiddlyWiki <http://confocal-manawatu.pbworks.com/Accessibility-to-Particular-Topics-on-TiddlyWiki> was deleted from the "Conveying: Moans about poor documentation" thread on by moderators without any reasoning given " We will see. Would you give me a link on the hangouts list, please? Search through the archive gave me nothing but frustration. :) If tiddlers are not organised, they are not likely to be found... Cheers, Dmitry On Wednesday, 28 December 2016 12:38:27 UTC+13, Mat wrote: > > On Tuesday, December 27, 2016 at 10:08:55 PM UTC+1, Dmitry Sokolov wrote: >> >> Dear All, >> >> would you have a link on a page with the TiddlyWiki Development Plans, >> please? >> > > I'd' say it is all rather whimsical, for good and for bad. The 'bad' is > obvious but the 'good' is that you can affect it yourself; The more you > participate in some matter and the more you keep it in the frontal lobe of > people, the more likely it is that you catch the interest of fellow > community members. People are also generally helpful if you ask for help on > specific matters that you're attempting to create. > > Note that much development takes place as non-official plugins, i.e > plugins that are not officially endorsed on tiddlywiki.com . > > There is however *some* kind of ephemeral idea of a plan. Possibly > clearer than my own impression of it. One of the later hangouts was > dedicated to this, maybe 3-4 hangouts ago. You can look in the hangout > agendas or even search here in the archives for "finishing TW5" or "finish > TW5" or something along those lines. > > This unpredictability is one of the costs for getting this incredible tool > for free. > > <:-) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ed7d20b3-ebe6-462f-8fe4-747d72b101f2%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
