Nothing like that worked on me Mat.

I will be building the doc portal the way I used to, helping others when I 
can and just hope some help will come in return, or may be even in 
advance!! :)
"Not easy to inspire non-paid free-thinkers to see the world in a 
particular way" - true! :)
We can do only what can be done.

On Wednesday, 28 December 2016 21:01:19 UTC+13, Mat wrote:
>
> People are also generally helpful if you ask for help on specific matters 
>>> that you're attempting to create.
>>>
>> I thought that the "opposite" approach would work, by capturing people's 
>> intents and co-ordinating their work:
>>
>> http://confocal-manawatu.pbworks.com/w/page/114069763/TiddlyWiki%20Intents%20Map
>>  Seems not working either... :)
>>
>
> Well, that seems like a good idea. If you promote it for a few months and 
> carefully note down the interests of people here on the boards you might 
> have some impact. I don't know. And it would be hard to measure. (But it is 
> clearly not enough to note down 2-3 names and wait 4 days).
>
> Here's a third route for consideration; jump on the current 
> "documentation" bandwagon with Reddit and StackExchange (...and more?). 
> You're free to push your agendas in the form of public questions and 
> answers there.
>
>  
>
>> The more you participate in some matter and the more you keep it in the 
>>> frontal lobe of people, the more likely it is that you catch the interest 
>>> of fellow community members. 
>>>
>> but that doesn't work either, in my experience on other forums. If 
>> accessibility to particular knowledge is not valued in this particular 
>> group, it will never be achieved. :) 
>>
>
> Maybe it's just not the particular knowledge that you're after? 
> Regardless, sure, if your issues trigger a desire among those who are 
> capable of developing stuff then of course they will do so. Not easy to 
> inspire non-paid free-thinkers to see the world in a particular way though 
> ;-)
>
>  
>
>> Here is the example recorded on LiM, TiddlyWiki Criticism 
>> <http://confocal-manawatu.pbworks.com/TiddlyWiki-Criticism>: 
>> "28Dec16 Accessibility to Particular Topics on TiddlyWiki 
>> <http://www.google.com/url?q=http%3A%2F%2Fconfocal-manawatu.pbworks.com%2FAccessibility-to-Particular-Topics-on-TiddlyWiki&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGTIv7eP-t3aZpUDkDhNNGiOyauAw>
>>  
>> was deleted from the "Conveying: Moans about poor documentation" thread on 
>> by moderators without any reasoning given "
>>
>
> I'd say it is VERY unlikely that the moderators would delete that post and 
> more likely there was some error or mistake made somewhere.
>  
>
> If tiddlers are not organised, they are not likely to be found...
>>
>
> Sounds like you should join in the current documentation efforts.
>
>
> <:-)
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e7ac3eba-9ea5-4816-a267-baa2899a0199%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to