Ciao David I have been thinking about your method of Auto-Tagging & ways I might benefit form it.
I have a Use Case that may be of interest ... - AIM: Analyse the novel Great Expectations for the occurrence of characters (like Tags: Pip, Estella, Havisham, Jaggers, Drummle ...) - HELPFUL AID: Auto tagging ALL the occurrence of NAMES of characters in the text so a student could get a useful visual sense of the pattern of occurrence. This leads me to some thoughts ... 1 - That the Auto-Tagging Gizmo be able to be TOGGLED on/off. Its very useful but it could also be over "noisy" as a perpetual thing in texts. Being able to toggle it on and off would, I think make it much more useful to someone like me. 2 - Taking that further ... an awkward? thought ... that the addition of in-text Auto-Pills could also just be done on strings in the text from a "Picklist", rather than from extant tags? In other words the tags are created dynamically according to what is on a "Picklest". Hope this is clear? Just thoughts. Best wishes Josiah On Thursday, 23 March 2017 19:50:39 UTC+1, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > I'm not ignoring it. Its just the particular implementation is not so > useful to me. BUT I am very interested in how to automate taggery. Both > FROM extant TW Tags and TO freshly create new Tags. > > My particular use case is being into Twitter. I often author using > #hashtags in text. The little gizmo that you looked at before from > tesseract was part written in reply to me about how to automate creation of > TW Tags from Twitter posts written in TW with #hashtags. A few interesting > cases came up like #Buddhist & #buddhist (equivalent on Twitter) end up in > TW as both "buddhist" & "Buddhist" tags. > > The mechanism to only deal with strings starting with a delimiter I do > think has value. A possible issue with your implementation is Taggitis? :-). > > NOT that this is that much to do with what you are doing, but I thought it > worth mentioning. > > Best wishes, and interest > Josiah > > On Thursday, 23 March 2017 16:07:05 UTC+1, David Szego wrote: >> >> Bump ... Much more usable version, go give it a try if you haven't >> already, or update the .js Tiddler if you've been playing with it. >> >> Cheers, >> David. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/425070d8-545a-4235-944f-cfba1ca33afe%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
