Hi folks - I made a major faux pas in the group by cc'ing this message to others -- I meant to forward it to them. If you could, please take care not to "reply all" so we don't flood their mailbox. My apologies to all. //steve.
On Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 10:16:33 AM UTC-4, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao Mark S. > > I agree that "chunking" is the central issue on performance. It is my > experience in testing that the more fine grained the chunking the slower > the performance. And it gets worse the larger the file. > > An interesting issue is, once the text is completed, is whether it would > be possible to output the "ePub version" with optimized JavaScript > dedicated to specific limited functions & not all of what TW normally does. > It might be worth thinking on since ePubs are increasingly ubiquitous. > > Josiah > > Mark S. wrote: >> >> The broader questions I would have is, how do you want to "chunk" the >> text into TW, and then how do you want overlay or link commentaries? The >> smaller the level of chunking, the easier it is to comment on precise bits >> of text, but the larger the file size and the slower the TW will be. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/bf70d447-fed3-44af-8c78-235fb29cbe1b%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
