The context of teaching & "cheating" is interesting. That TW could be cheated by someone who knew what they were doing is a plus in my view :-). A+ for smarts. Though B- for not playing fair:-)
On a more serious note, how you could solve this without a server solution? There is a point at which TW, as currently implemented, isn't really anywhere an elegant solution. I am very interested in the potential of Danielo's TW version, *NOTESELF <https://noteself.github.io/>*, that (1) saves to browser storage, not files; (2) can co-ordinate its running on multiple devices via a Cloudant server. I think its a very interesting approach that might be leveraged towards multi-user approaches and passworded levels of authentication. Danielo created it for himself, not for explicit multi-user situations, but both the Cloudant (server database) and PouchDB (local storage database) have built in potential in the required direction. Its very interesting because its keeps the full local ownership of TW, yet combines it with a remote database. It runs with or without it the remote database. My 2 cents Josiah Stephen Wilson wrote... > > ... it would take a little more effort to try and game the system than >> simply submitting a friends assignment and hoping I don't notice. >> > > PMario replied ... > If they trick the system, they have to dig relatively deep. .. So you can > use this "assignment work" as the base for a grade :)) ... once > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/904295f3-e42b-4283-b8ad-98cab7be809d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
