Ciao Mark S. Mark S. wrote: > > You're advocating "bowing" to an edition of FF that is a compromise meant > for large organizations >
Yes. And no. That's more their marketing pitch than anything to fuss over. I'm more advocating a version of Firefox that is slightly behind, slightly more open to legacy, and definitely helpful for running TiddlyFox for a while yet. That is all. And FirefoxESR is pretty much that for desktop users. > and which makes you sign up yet again for another list. > There is NO list you have to sign to. That's just spiel on the Mozilla site. Basically its Firefox with a bit more flexibility and, at the moment, less swishing about all over the shop the other versions will be doing for the next half year. > Plus, with the coming changes, there may be fewer reasons to want FF in > the first place. > I agree. With some reluctance, as my several years Firefox setup has served well. > The main problem with the default mechanism is the munged files it > creates. > I agree. > I can imagine (at least for windows) a shell script that is used for > launching your TW. It sifts through the munged titles, archives the old > ones, copies the newest one to your TW starting directory, and launches it > there. So, just like a first-class app, it would have an icon on your > desktop. > Its a nice & interesting probing. It would be interesting to see an example and whether it could be generalised. Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b4c33194-2550-4ec6-b87c-4e42f1be342d%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
