Hmm, I haven't tried yet. Let me find out ... The answer is both yes and no.
Yes, it appears all of my modifications were saved when I used the traditional TiddlyWiki save button (to trigger download) and looked into the file directly (text editor). But when I then tried to load the saved file into a browser I got a RSOE (tried both IE 11 and Chrome on Windows). So, in the sense of having something that just works, it failed. If I had the time and skill, I might try to look deeper into NoteSelf with the goal of making a CouchDB saver plugin. There also appears to be a bug in that NoteSelf either blocks or prevents the encryption built into TiddlyWiki from working. On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 10:34:15 AM UTC-4, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao Lost Admin > > I do think the PouchDB / CouchDB approach is interesting. MOST INTERESTING > about it is its seeming *universality across most platforms as far as I > can see*. Because its saving to database its fragmenting the one-file > model. And the one-file model is central to TW. And I hope it stays so. So > long as one can EXPORT a one file from a Pouched TW it will instantiate its > origins. Can it do that? > > Josiah > > Lost Admin wrote: >> >> I hate to say this, but I think the "real solution" is go give-in to the >> current trend of pushing eveything to a "web application" and run it from a >> server in "the cloud". >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/374ba0c1-6877-407a-8946-542778f6e3ca%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
