On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 3:17:48 PM UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
> Looking at Fountain <https://fountain.io/syntax>, that thread deals with 
> its markup system for screenplays--I think it could be simplified for TW a 
> lot.
>

Not really. TW-markup is different to fountain markup. Mixing things, IMO 
would be confusing. ... A new parser would probably be easier in the long 
run. 
 

> The UNDERLYING ISSUE is whether a "deep level" Javascript parser *(and 
> likely a new "content type")*
>

As above. imo easier to deal with in the long run. 

PMario opined it wasn't possible without JavaScript coding.
>

I didn't say it's not possible. ... But I don't see it. ... For me a new 
parser would be much simpler to understand and implement. ... There are js 
libraries already: https://github.com/mattdaly/Fountain.js  It should be 
simple to implement it, similar to the markdown stuff. ... BUT that's not 
the whole truth. 

The magic, that's really needed, is a "sketchbook", where you write down 
your ideas about scenes, characters, .... and then combine the stuff to a 
story. ... The text parsers are just a means to an end. 

have fun!
mario

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ef1cccc8-f284-468a-ba13-f1cec9ec60b8%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to