Ciao PMario et al, PMario wrote:
> What if ... we would make commonmark [1] markdown [2] a 100% subset [3] of > the TiddlyWiki syntax? > Rather than CommonMark wouldn't Github Flavoured Markdown (GFM) be a better aim? Its ... 1. compliant with CommonMark; 2. adds tables and other things Markdown does not do; 3. better services existing TW users who also use GitHub. The specification comments ... *GFM is a strict superset of CommonMark*. All the features which are > supported in GitHub user content and that are not specified on the original > CommonMark Spec are hence known as *extensions*, and highlighted as such. > See: GFM Specification <https://github.github.com/gfm/> Early thoughts Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/dff441ac-7953-4567-b9c8-70779a9a67e1%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
