TonyM I do use CKEDITOR in one TW. And I'm familiar with TinyMCE. Their expansion to allow live editing of whole pages (can't do that in TW) is great. Their growing model of "everything is editable" is a good one. A model where the rendered version and the editable version are co-terminus.
J. On Friday, 15 December 2017 02:25:29 UTC+1, TonyM wrote: > > I assume you have seen existing TiddlyWiki WISYWIG solutions? > > On Friday, 15 December 2017 12:20:32 UTC+11, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> Personally I think a SWOP of what we currently have would be ideal. By >> which I mean you edit in WYSIWYG and there is a pane that displays the >> underlying code (that ideally you could also edit). >> >> Likely much later. J, x >> >> On Friday, 15 December 2017 01:11:12 UTC+1, TonyM wrote: >>> >>> Josiah, >>> >>> >>>> The problem with HTML is only readability (the LOGIC is great, the >>>> visuals of the actual code are crap). I'd far rather have my originating >>>> stuff in TiddlyWiki / Markdown / MediaWiki syntax IF i don't have true >>>> WYSIWYG in the editor. Once I have that I don't care >>>> >>> >>> I understand your point, but when it is a complex, nested structure with >>> loops (lists) there is real value having open and closed elements, full >>> control of line breaks and classes/styles. >>> >>> Sometime this even beats WYSIWIG because the structure logic and tag >>> names allow reference to the elements and logic there in. >>> >>> I think there would be value identifying and documenting the use cases >>> for HTML usage in tiddlywiki. >>> >>> Regards >>> Tony >>> >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2acee18a-1371-4bac-9e50-4ff6122d4d13%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
