On Monday, December 18, 2017 at 3:08:31 PM UTC+1, Dragon Cotterill wrote: > > No, blockchain is not suitable for TW. >
Yes and No ... The concepts and mechanisms of blockchains are definitely intersting, even in a TW context. ... I'm intentionally using the plurals here. There are many "blockchains" existing already and every "cloud-provider" has their own implementation. Not every single one of them is expensive to use. ... I think, that dat-project [1] is a bit better aligned, to the TW usecase. ... BUT and also enabling to monetize ones efforts if desired? > is an issue there. There is a nice blog post, from the guy behind the beaker-browser : Cryptographically-secure change feeds in the Dat protocol, and on the Web ... Why the mechanisms are a thing, but the chain itself is not. .. have fun! mario [1] https://datproject.org/ [2] https://beakerbrowser.com/2017/06/19/cryptographically-secure-change-feeds.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2795df3b-2683-4199-a8f6-2a1ac43fc202%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
