Thanks Mark S. TWEDERATION needs signing so that you don't get crap or threats arriving? Right?
I am familiar with PGP. I'm not sure how many other TW users are. Whatever the system it needs be as automated as possible otherwise it could confuse a stupid person. J, x On Monday, 18 December 2017 18:20:06 UTC+1, Mark S. wrote: > > It's needed for Twederation to prevent injection of spoofed spam. > > I will add that someone will object that in Twederation there is no danger > because you are *pulling* all tiddlers. But in reality, in a shared > environment involving more than say 10 users, you do not want to have to > check and verify *all* the traffic that you may be pulling into your > system. Having a system that approves tiddlers based on proven, trusted > signatures would allow node traffic to continue even if you have a busy day > and can't look at every incoming tiddler immediately. > > -- Mark > > On Monday, December 18, 2017 at 7:56:34 AM UTC-8, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> Right. Signing via PGP. Kinda makes more sense. >> >> Though, BTW, I'm actually UNCLEAR why any signing is needed? >> >> For WHAT? >> >> Mark S. wrote: >>> >>> It sounds more like you want PGP/GPG style digital signing, which would >>> have less overhead than bitcoin. >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/707a3496-8946-4e9a-9693-aacc05ce4008%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
