Right. Signing via PGP. Kinda makes more sense. Though, BTW, I'm actually UNCLEAR why any signing is needed?
For WHAT? Mark S. wrote: > > It sounds more like you want PGP/GPG style digital signing, which would > have less overhead than bitcoin. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/bf0c313c-2483-4f05-890d-e2294b286924%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
