TonyM wrote: > > What I am trying to say is can we make a field that containes a unique id >> stored in a field for any (not nessasarily every) tiddler that is >> independant of its name. >> > > PMario replied: > > ... I think UUIDs and human readable titles may even coexist.... > > I don't think a new uuid-field will be a real solution. >
Solution to what? I think in some use cases a UUID field would have great utility. The discussion is a bit confused between an attempt to change some thing rudimentary (forget it) and supporting a structured logic for a work-around that could make TW more like a Database (i.e. with unique record numbers ) I think the point is not that TW in any way at centre needs UUIDs. Rather that---as an extension---a UUID field could be the HUB of a work-around for SOME cases. IMO the issue is not what is in the core. Rather about some standardization around getting it to behave a bit more like a standard database through extension ... IF you need that. UUIDs are the easiest way to that IMO. Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5f0ddbfd-4cc4-4f02-8d18-97410ff4445b%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
