Jed Carty wrote: > > I think that trying to define these as exclusive categories is a problem > because almost none of the options fit into just one. Almost all of the > servers can save wikis but because of the scary name people may avoid > something because it says it is a server instead of a saver when it is both. >
The key question is what brings light to the user. I hope the categories will answer his question "I want something that can X. I'll see what set-ups fulfill this!" and perhaps also "I know very little about what I want so I need to know what I should consider when setting up a TW system" One problem with the portability part is that the list is referring to if > the installation is portable, not if the usable part is portable. I am not > tied to any specific device to use TiddlySpot but it isn't portable in the > sense used by the table. > Yeah. Maybe "self-contained" is a better angle? Or perhaps that interferes with "dependencies"? Maybe the criteria should be "USB-stick'able"? or, "e-mail'able"? IMO it would be fair to put "Yes" for a service like TiddlySpot on this because you can still use it without fuzz from e.g a USB-stick. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b49dcca8-a541-4109-a93c-aaf1c3b58cd4%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
