Thank you Josiah! Yes, I see many users, many developers, many works! but a policy a system to use this synergy more efficiently is MISSING! TW is really a great tool with a huge potential it deserve to have a much better ecosystem!
/Mohammad On Saturday, June 16, 2018 at 4:33:47 PM UTC+4:30, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Ciao Mohammad > > A few comments that maybe help you get where TW is. > > Mohammad wrote: >> >> This is a great place to find resources on TW. >> > > Absolutely. TiddlyToolMap <https://dynalist.io/d/zUP-nIWu2FFoXH-oM7L7d9DM>, > whatever its limits, is the best Resource Reference for users TW has ever > had. > > >> One improvement could come by help of other users (specially developers, >> advanced users) to check and review those resources and give their >> recommendation! >> > > The problem is that TiddlyToolMap is just one person's work. Its held on a > very simple online outliner. It has no interactive tools. > > The best bet is to LOBBY (push for) it to be collectively adopted and made > into a full-scale data repository where up-voting and notes become possible > by developers and others. > > BUT David is just doing what he can easily so we should never make that > his problem. > > Right now he IS TiddlyToolMap. But he has already said > > *...* >> >> *I would hope that ... people ... would feel free to use the info in my >>> toolmap to create similar things according to the criteria they set.* >>> >> > Some of them may be obsolete or use the wrong and incorrect method to >> implement something! >> > > The issue with compatibility, both forwards and backwards is important. > Also that presentation of resources is basically similar so users don't get > confused. > > David can ensure neither. If he got into that the list would not get > updated. Too much work for one person. > > BUT, far better to have something imperfect working than an idea of > something perfect that is not possible because of the work involved :-) You > see my point? > > >> By the way, this is one of the best places to find TW resources. >> Thank you David for all your efforts! >> > > >> One more comment >> It seems TW is growing day by day, what is missing is a good documentation >> > > Its a "moot point" (meaning its "maybe not so simple"). > > On the one hand some things ARE under-documented. A current example is how > to apply non-global CSS styles, which recently changed quite radically. > > On the other hand a lot IS documented but GETS LOST because there is NO > method in the Google Groups to tag anything that would allow you to find it > later. > > In other words, the Documentation issue, in many ways, is exactly the same > as the Resources Issue that David has a given a clear solution to through > TiddlyToolMap. > > If someone could do a TiddlyManualMap for docs. you'd see what I mean. > > Great questions. I enjoyed trying to answer them from my point of view. > > Best wishes > Josiah > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/1c6ffe3c-bda3-4fef-876a-11dfef9a30dc%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
